<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harlequins, Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secretvespers.com/2008/07/25/harlequins-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secretvespers.com/2008/07/25/harlequins-part-3/</link>
	<description>by Patrick Edwards-Daugherty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:37:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madness</title>
		<link>http://secretvespers.com/2008/07/25/harlequins-part-3/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>Madness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secretvespers.com/?p=327#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Dying civilization? Really?

There&#039;s nothing wrong in recycling. Why, the early research of the Chaos Theory was based on using old data, thrown away because the experimenters thought their instruments were crappy.

Nature is of an infinite complexity. Humanity can do as many double-takes as necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dying civilization? Really?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong in recycling. Why, the early research of the Chaos Theory was based on using old data, thrown away because the experimenters thought their instruments were crappy.</p>
<p>Nature is of an infinite complexity. Humanity can do as many double-takes as necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MalikTous</title>
		<link>http://secretvespers.com/2008/07/25/harlequins-part-3/#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>MalikTous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secretvespers.com/?p=327#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>Our dying civilisation fears implementing new ideas, so our inventions only seek to re-use old ones. My next life will not be on this world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our dying civilisation fears implementing new ideas, so our inventions only seek to re-use old ones. My next life will not be on this world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orinoco womble</title>
		<link>http://secretvespers.com/2008/07/25/harlequins-part-3/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>orinoco womble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secretvespers.com/?p=327#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>I love it! &quot;The age of mash-up.&quot; Yes. Also the age of the remake. As Michael Caine so perceptively put it, anyone can remake a disaster and hope to come up with something better, but how can you do a remake of a runaway success, and hope to improve on it?

Is it progress, or lack of imagination?

Are there really no more new dreams left?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it! &#8220;The age of mash-up.&#8221; Yes. Also the age of the remake. As Michael Caine so perceptively put it, anyone can remake a disaster and hope to come up with something better, but how can you do a remake of a runaway success, and hope to improve on it?</p>
<p>Is it progress, or lack of imagination?</p>
<p>Are there really no more new dreams left?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

